The main advantage of proton therapy is the significantly better dose distribution of the radiation dose to critical organs. Doses applied to the bladder and rectum are typically 25-50% compared to published doses for modern photon techniques. In the case of pelvic radiotherapy, the doses to the abdominal organs are 5-10% of the prescribed dose. The results of proton radiotherapy are better than recent published work for photon radiotherapy.

  • Spratt et al. describe 5-year biochemical relapse-free survival in intermediate-risk prostate cancer treated with either external radiotherapy using the IMRT technique or the combination of IMRT and brachytherapy at the level of approximately 90% for IMRT (81.4% after 7 years) and approximately 95% in the combination of IMRT and BRT (92% after 7 years). Grade 2 toxicity or higher (CTCAE v. 4) reached the following levels at the evaluation after 7 years: GU (genitourinary) – 19.6% for IMRT and 21.2% for the combined treatment; grade 3 GU toxicity was 3.1 and 1.4%, respectively; GI (Gastrointestinal) – grade 2 and above 4.6 and 4.1%, respectively; grade 3 0.4% and 1.4%, respectively.
  • Odrážka et al. describe 5-year biochemical control of prostate cancer treated with IMRT at the level of 86%, 89% and 82% for low-risk, medium-risk and high-risk, respectively. The late toxicity (RTOG/FC-LENT) grade 2 or higher was: GU and GI 17.7% and 22.4%, respectively.

Particle radiotherapy in the treatment of prostate cancer achieves the best dose distributions of available radiotherapy techniques. Prospective non-randomized studies demonstrate its high efficacy and very low toxicity, and patients treated at PTC confirm these data.

 

Table 1: Comparison of effectiveness and toxicity of individual radiotherapeutic methods and the treatment of low-risk prostate cancer.

Proton therapy IMRT Brachytherapy
Efficacy (5-year disease-free survival) 99% 86-90% 97%
Toxicity – genitourinary, Grade 2 and higher <5% 15-20% 20-30%
Toxicity – gastrointestinary, Grade 2 and higher 4% 15-25% 0-5%
Erectile dysfunction 90% 78% 60%


As evidenced by the data provided in the table, the undesirable effects after photon therapy are significantly higher than after proton radiotherapy.

Figure 1 and Table 2 are examples of an irradiation plan and dose distribution to individual organs. It is clear that a significantly lower or zero dose is applied to healthy tissue during proton radiotherapy.

Figure 1: Example of a plan: photon IMRT vs. proton IMPT.

 

Table 2: Dose for each structure/organ.

  IMRT (photons) IMPT (protons)
Target volume Prostate 78 Gy (100%) 78 Gy (100%)
Organs at risk

 

Rectum Dmean 40,2 Gy (51%) 17,5 Gy (18,7%)
Bladder D(50%) 9,5 Gy (12%) 0,9 Gy (1%)

Book "Protonová radioterapie", author Pavel Vítek et al., published by Maxdorf

Purchase the book via the link below.

Book "Co byste měli vědět o rakovině prsu", author Jitka Abrahámová et al., published by Grada

Purchase the book via the link below.